Research Paper Volume 15, Issue 16 pp 7974—7996

Prognostic significance and mechanisms of CXCL genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

class="figure-viewer-img"

Figure 5. Unsupervised cluster analysis for TAN 1/2 markers in the KIRC dataset. The CDF plot (A-1) and delta area plot (A-2). (B) Indicates the KM analysis for the 5 subtypes. (C) Shows the prognostic value and TAN 2 markers for the subtype 1/2. The CXCL genes (C-1) for the subtype 1/2, the KM analysis (C-2) for subtype 1/2, the TAN 2 markers (C-3) between subtype 1/2, and the percentage of immune components (C-4) for the subtype 1/2. (D) Illustrates the different expression genes and lasso analysis for subtype 1/2. The volcano plot (D-1) and the process of lasso analysis (D-2). (E) Shows the prognostic value of TAN-related risk score in the KIRC dataset. The KM analysis (E-1) for different risk scores, the ROC time-dependent analysis (E-2), The forest plot of the univariate COX analysis for risk score and other clinical information (E-3), The nomogram (E-4). (F) Shows the comparison between 5 different renal cancer-related signatures. The ROC time-dependent analysis (F-1) and DCA analysis (F-2).